An artificial intelligence magazine
SMARTAGI
What happens when human decisions pass through an algorithm.
OpenAI has released results at different stages of verification. Lean can check a formalisation, but certification, mathematical understanding and editorial responsibility answer different questions.
The makers of AI assistants promise political neutrality. The US president and the owner of one of those companies have begun explaining, each in his own way, what they mean by it.
Codex answered 60 statements; Grok answered 240. Claude and Google’s assistant refused to tick boxes, but not to decide which arguments deserved attention. The assignments were not identical, so this was neither a ranking nor a controlled experiment. It does leave a harder question for anyone asking an AI for political advice: what does an assistant decide when it decides what to tell you?
A switch can stop the system. It cannot guarantee that an institution can replace it and keep serving the people who depend on it.
He proposes embedded external evaluators, coordination among democracies and a global agreement with China, while insisting that the US and its allies preserve their lead.
Commentary by SmartAGI · Read the original ↗
How do you challenge a public decision when the answer is “the algorithm says so”? Rodrigo Castillo Murillo and Francisco Figueroa Ogalde in El Dínamo.
Commentary by SmartAGI · Read the original ↗
You tell a chatbot something. Who can read it later? Rodrigo Castillo Murillo and Francisco Figueroa Ogalde in El Mostrador.
Commentary by SmartAGI · Read the original ↗
A superior intelligence does not choose for us what deserves to be preserved.